<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Take a stand against DRM? Get fired from your day job.</title>
	<atom:link href="http://freeculturenyu.org/2006/01/drm-fired/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://freeculturenyu.org/2006/01/drm-fired/</link>
	<description>Free Culture @ NYU&#039;s own weblog ... information on events, meetings, and goings on in the free culture world</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 19 Oct 2009 09:24:13 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Sw florida models actors</title>
		<link>http://freeculturenyu.org/2006/01/drm-fired/comment-page-1/#comment-1164635</link>
		<dc:creator>Sw florida models actors</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 Dec 2006 21:00:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.freeculturenyu.org/2006/01/31/a-grave-injustice/#comment-1164635</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Sw florida models actors&lt;/strong&gt;

I&#039;m agree with you, i  think... Sw florida models actors ...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Sw florida models actors</strong></p>
<p>I&#8217;m agree with you, i  think&#8230; Sw florida models actors &#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Asian big boob picture</title>
		<link>http://freeculturenyu.org/2006/01/drm-fired/comment-page-1/#comment-1164634</link>
		<dc:creator>Asian big boob picture</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 Dec 2006 18:55:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.freeculturenyu.org/2006/01/31/a-grave-injustice/#comment-1164634</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Asian big boob picture&lt;/strong&gt;

I&#039;m agree with you, i  think... Asian big boob picture ...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Asian big boob picture</strong></p>
<p>I&#8217;m agree with you, i  think&#8230; Asian big boob picture &#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Employment Law</title>
		<link>http://freeculturenyu.org/2006/01/drm-fired/comment-page-1/#comment-1164633</link>
		<dc:creator>Employment Law</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Dec 2006 05:25:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.freeculturenyu.org/2006/01/31/a-grave-injustice/#comment-1164633</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Markus&lt;/strong&gt;

It was quite useful reading, found some interesting details about this topic. Thanks.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Markus</strong></p>
<p>It was quite useful reading, found some interesting details about this topic. Thanks.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Copyright Laws</title>
		<link>http://freeculturenyu.org/2006/01/drm-fired/comment-page-1/#comment-1164632</link>
		<dc:creator>Copyright Laws</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Nov 2006 11:23:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.freeculturenyu.org/2006/01/31/a-grave-injustice/#comment-1164632</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Markus&lt;/strong&gt;

It was quite useful reading, found some interesting details about this topic. Thanks.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Markus</strong></p>
<p>It was quite useful reading, found some interesting details about this topic. Thanks.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: stralunato</title>
		<link>http://freeculturenyu.org/2006/01/drm-fired/comment-page-1/#comment-1164631</link>
		<dc:creator>stralunato</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 05 Feb 2006 17:09:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.freeculturenyu.org/2006/01/31/a-grave-injustice/#comment-1164631</guid>
		<description></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Despedida por hacer uso de su libertad</strong></p>
<p>&#8230;De su libertad de expresión, claro.<br />
Inga Chernyak es una joven universitaria y actual presidenta del capítulo neoyorquino de Free Culture&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Online Security  &#187; Blog Archive   &#187; Take a stand against DRM? Get fired.</title>
		<link>http://freeculturenyu.org/2006/01/drm-fired/comment-page-1/#comment-1164630</link>
		<dc:creator>Online Security  &#187; Blog Archive   &#187; Take a stand against DRM? Get fired.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Feb 2006 02:37:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.freeculturenyu.org/2006/01/31/a-grave-injustice/#comment-1164630</guid>
		<description>[...] llectual property rights law firm in midtown Manhatttan. The reason? Her opinions on DRM. 	read more&#160;&#124;&#160;digg story  			 									 					 						 							  								This entry [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] llectual property rights law firm in midtown Manhatttan. The reason? Her opinions on DRM. 	read more&nbsp;|&nbsp;digg story  			</p>
<p> 								This entry [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Fred</title>
		<link>http://freeculturenyu.org/2006/01/drm-fired/comment-page-1/#comment-1164629</link>
		<dc:creator>Fred</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Feb 2006 20:37:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.freeculturenyu.org/2006/01/31/a-grave-injustice/#comment-1164629</guid>
		<description>I just want to address the numerous analogies that people are making regarding Inga&#039;s choice to work for her firm: &quot;Its like a anti-abortion rights activist/high times contributor/etc working for planned parenthood/DEA/etc&quot; I think these are missing the point and maligning Inga&#039;s motivations -- her interest and position at the IP firm was as someone who was working to learn things about the field that she has been interested in. It was not, and this is where the analogies fail, her intent to subvert the firm or even damage its reputation in any way. Her working there was an innocent attempt by a student at gaining a legitimate foothold in the world of IP in New York. Again, these analogies would lead one to believe she was actively working to betray the firm; an accusation I can assure you, is certainly misplaced.

xrew: Inga was not fired because her boss didn&#039;t like her or because she was in any way not competent to do the job she was hired for. She was fired because of her views on a subject that firm may or may not have dealt with, ie DRM. I hope, for your sake, that you are able to distinguish the difference between disliking someone and disagreeing with their views.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I just want to address the numerous analogies that people are making regarding Inga&#8217;s choice to work for her firm: &#8220;Its like a anti-abortion rights activist/high times contributor/etc working for planned parenthood/DEA/etc&#8221; I think these are missing the point and maligning Inga&#8217;s motivations &#8212; her interest and position at the IP firm was as someone who was working to learn things about the field that she has been interested in. It was not, and this is where the analogies fail, her intent to subvert the firm or even damage its reputation in any way. Her working there was an innocent attempt by a student at gaining a legitimate foothold in the world of IP in New York. Again, these analogies would lead one to believe she was actively working to betray the firm; an accusation I can assure you, is certainly misplaced.</p>
<p>xrew: Inga was not fired because her boss didn&#8217;t like her or because she was in any way not competent to do the job she was hired for. She was fired because of her views on a subject that firm may or may not have dealt with, ie DRM. I hope, for your sake, that you are able to distinguish the difference between disliking someone and disagreeing with their views.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: memorywank</title>
		<link>http://freeculturenyu.org/2006/01/drm-fired/comment-page-1/#comment-1164628</link>
		<dc:creator>memorywank</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Feb 2006 17:49:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.freeculturenyu.org/2006/01/31/a-grave-injustice/#comment-1164628</guid>
		<description>Jefferson had no misgivings about protecting private property. Yet he expressed some serious doubts about the wisdom of copyright. These concerns were based on his suspicion of concentrations of power and artificial monopolies. Therefore, Jefferson feared the monopolists could use their state-granted power to strengthen their control over the flow of ideas and the use of expressions. Monopolies have the power to enrich themselves by evading the limitations of the competitive marketplace.  Meat is murder ?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jefferson had no misgivings about protecting private property. Yet he expressed some serious doubts about the wisdom of copyright. These concerns were based on his suspicion of concentrations of power and artificial monopolies. Therefore, Jefferson feared the monopolists could use their state-granted power to strengthen their control over the flow of ideas and the use of expressions. Monopolies have the power to enrich themselves by evading the limitations of the competitive marketplace.  Meat is murder ?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: xrew</title>
		<link>http://freeculturenyu.org/2006/01/drm-fired/comment-page-1/#comment-1164627</link>
		<dc:creator>xrew</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Feb 2006 15:14:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.freeculturenyu.org/2006/01/31/a-grave-injustice/#comment-1164627</guid>
		<description>&quot;Certainly, it is wrong to eject someone from their field of interest simply for exercising her first amendment rights and speaking out against the current.&quot;

This is an extremely naive view. Your expression of contrary views could very easily be seen by potential clients as a reason NOT to employ the firm you work for, regardless a rational basis. Your views could also be used as an excuse for a disappointed client to take legal action against your firm in an extreme case. Business in America is NOT a democracy, it is a vicious and brutal war between competitors where millions if not billions of dollars are at stake. With that kind of money on the line, people simply don&#039;t take chances, ever.

If your personal views threaten the health of a business, you better believe that the money you might cost your firm will outweigh your personal rights of expression in a heartbeat. Freedom of expression (which I support 100%) is not a license to threaten the hard work of others. If those who choose (yes, it is their choice) to employ you absolutely have the right to choose not to employ you based on your oppositional views. For example, would you hire a nanny to care for your child who had oppositional views on how to raise your child?

Companies don&#039;t exist to employ you. They exist to earn a profit... no other reason. They also equate to the personal property of the proprietors, in which said proprietor has the right to develop whatever culture of thought he/she chooses to within their company. They also have the right to protect their investment in any way they see fit, so long as they don&#039;t violate any laws in the process. That is why it is legal to fire someone in NY State simply because the boss doesn&#039;t like the person being fired. If I start a company, hire someone and then at some point decided that said person is a dickhead, I can fire them for that reason alone. Sure, it would require lots of legal speak about their potentially destructive nature within my company, but the bottom line is, if I don&#039;t like someone, I shouldn&#039;t have to endure their presence within my company. It is (in this instance) MY company after all.

With regard to your stance on copyright infringement, I have to say that you are absolutely 100% wrong. I am a photographer and when my images are used for profit by others without my consent, you better believe I am going to sue the offending parties ass off. I have invested hundreds of thousands of dollars and decades of effort at personal expense in my career in order to pursue my craft/art/whatever. When others decided they&#039;re allowed to use the images I create at my own expense without permission or paying me for my time and effort, they are actively destroying my ability to function as a photographer. In my world, the bottom line equates to theft of services, personal and potentially intellectual property and absolutely threatens my ability to eat, sleep under a warm roof and function in my chosen profession.
The same holds true with any form of copyright theft. Musicians, artists, crafts(people), whatever... cannot survive if they are not paid for their efforts. Personal investment must equate to personal reward, or the land of creative free enterprise will cease to exist. The sad truth in this world is, people need to earn a living and those in the creative fields are more often than not, barely able to do so in this world.

I am sorry you lost your job over your beliefs, but I do support the firm in question right to have fired you.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Certainly, it is wrong to eject someone from their field of interest simply for exercising her first amendment rights and speaking out against the current.&#8221;</p>
<p>This is an extremely naive view. Your expression of contrary views could very easily be seen by potential clients as a reason NOT to employ the firm you work for, regardless a rational basis. Your views could also be used as an excuse for a disappointed client to take legal action against your firm in an extreme case. Business in America is NOT a democracy, it is a vicious and brutal war between competitors where millions if not billions of dollars are at stake. With that kind of money on the line, people simply don&#8217;t take chances, ever.</p>
<p>If your personal views threaten the health of a business, you better believe that the money you might cost your firm will outweigh your personal rights of expression in a heartbeat. Freedom of expression (which I support 100%) is not a license to threaten the hard work of others. If those who choose (yes, it is their choice) to employ you absolutely have the right to choose not to employ you based on your oppositional views. For example, would you hire a nanny to care for your child who had oppositional views on how to raise your child?</p>
<p>Companies don&#8217;t exist to employ you. They exist to earn a profit&#8230; no other reason. They also equate to the personal property of the proprietors, in which said proprietor has the right to develop whatever culture of thought he/she chooses to within their company. They also have the right to protect their investment in any way they see fit, so long as they don&#8217;t violate any laws in the process. That is why it is legal to fire someone in NY State simply because the boss doesn&#8217;t like the person being fired. If I start a company, hire someone and then at some point decided that said person is a dickhead, I can fire them for that reason alone. Sure, it would require lots of legal speak about their potentially destructive nature within my company, but the bottom line is, if I don&#8217;t like someone, I shouldn&#8217;t have to endure their presence within my company. It is (in this instance) MY company after all.</p>
<p>With regard to your stance on copyright infringement, I have to say that you are absolutely 100% wrong. I am a photographer and when my images are used for profit by others without my consent, you better believe I am going to sue the offending parties ass off. I have invested hundreds of thousands of dollars and decades of effort at personal expense in my career in order to pursue my craft/art/whatever. When others decided they&#8217;re allowed to use the images I create at my own expense without permission or paying me for my time and effort, they are actively destroying my ability to function as a photographer. In my world, the bottom line equates to theft of services, personal and potentially intellectual property and absolutely threatens my ability to eat, sleep under a warm roof and function in my chosen profession.<br />
The same holds true with any form of copyright theft. Musicians, artists, crafts(people), whatever&#8230; cannot survive if they are not paid for their efforts. Personal investment must equate to personal reward, or the land of creative free enterprise will cease to exist. The sad truth in this world is, people need to earn a living and those in the creative fields are more often than not, barely able to do so in this world.</p>
<p>I am sorry you lost your job over your beliefs, but I do support the firm in question right to have fired you.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: blog.the-erm.com &#187; Blog Archive  &#187; Free Culture @ NYU  » Blog Archive   » Take a stand against DRM? Get fired from your day job.</title>
		<link>http://freeculturenyu.org/2006/01/drm-fired/comment-page-1/#comment-1164626</link>
		<dc:creator>blog.the-erm.com &#187; Blog Archive  &#187; Free Culture @ NYU  » Blog Archive   » Take a stand against DRM? Get fired from your day job.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Feb 2006 06:40:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.freeculturenyu.org/2006/01/31/a-grave-injustice/#comment-1164626</guid>
		<description></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...]  @ NYU  » Blog Archive   » Take a stand against DRM? Get fired from your day job.<br />
       Free Culture @ NYU  » Blog Archive   » Take a stand against DRM? Get fired from your day job. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
